Doe v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The
E. Doe |
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The doing business as Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools |
3:2020cv00636 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
William L Campbell |
Jeffery S Frensley |
Eli J Richardson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by E. Doe. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The waiver sent on 9/1/2020. (Crofford, Stephen) |
Filing 6 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/23/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: I hereby recuse myself in this matter. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/23/2020. (Note: Case reassigned to District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr for all further proceedings. District Judge Eli J. Richardson no longer assigned to case.) (mg) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/29/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (mg) |
Filing 3 Summons issued as to Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The. Service copies will be returned to counsel (Stephen Crofford) by mail. (mg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3181381), filed by E. Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Memorandem on Summary Judgment in Case No. 3:17-cv-01098, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Stephen C. Crofford, and Mary Ann Parker. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Doe v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: E. Doe | |
Represented By: | Mary Ann Parker |
Represented By: | Stephen C. Crofford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The doing business as Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.