Hamlett et al v. Jollay Masonry, Inc. et al
Gerald Hamlett, Perry Spencer, Jeffrey Hamlett, Antonio Sales and Frank Shanes |
Shane Epperson, Tony Hipps, Jollay Masonry, Inc., Michael Taylor, Danny Teague, Raymond Hamley, Willie Master and Eddie Taylor |
3:2020cv00648 |
July 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Aleta A Trauger |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons issued as to Shane Epperson, Raymond Hamley, Tony Hipps, Jollay Masonry, Inc., Willie Master, Eddie Taylor, Michael Taylor, Danny Teague. (Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail.)(dt) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (dt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shane Epperson, Raymond Hamley, Tony Hipps, Jollay Masonry, Inc., Willie Master, Eddie Taylor, Michael Taylor and Danny Teague (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3184692), filed by Perry Spencer, Frank Shanes, Gerald Hamlett, Antonio Sales, Jeffrey Hamlett. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Jonathan A. Street, G. Brandon Hall and Curt M. Masker. (dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.