Finch v. United States of America
| Deunta Finch |
| United States of America |
| 3:2020cv00653 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
REPLY filed by Deunta Finch re #8 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by United States of America. (Holley, Michael)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Order Filing of Answer to Motion to Vacate Sentence filed by United States of America. (Dean, Rascoe)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #6 MOTION to Order Filing of Answer filed by Deunta Finch, Petitioner's newly appointed counsel reviewed his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 and informed this court he did not intend to amend Petitioner's petition. (Dkt. No. 6.) The government is directed to respond to Petitioner's petition on or before September 17, 2020. Petitioner is directed to reply to Respondent on or before October 1, 2020. It is so ordered. Motion terminated: #6 . Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 8/18/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs) Modified text on 8/21/2020 (hb).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Order Filing of Answer by Deunta Finch. (Holley, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Petitioner Deunta Finch, through counsel, filed a motion for leave to substitute counsel for George Travis Hawkins. (Dkt. No. 4.) We grant that motion. Michael Holley is substituted in as counsel and George Hawkins appearance is terminated. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 8/4/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Substitute Attorney and Notice of Appearance by Deunta Finch. (Holley, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by United States of America (Substitution of Counsel) (Dean, Rascoe)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Rascoe S. Dean. (am)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael C. Holley. (am)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for George Travis Hawkins, Brent Adams Hannafan. (am)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Deunta Finch.(am)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Finch v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Brent Adams Hannafan |
| Represented By: | Rascoe S. Dean |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Deunta Finch | |
| Represented By: | George Travis Hawkins |
| Represented By: | Michael C. Holley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
