Ward v. Venture Express, Inc.
| Thomas Ward |
| Venture Express, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00698 |
| August 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Continue Initial Case Management Conference.The Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is hereby RESET for 11/18/2020 at 9:30 a.m. The conference will be held telephonically, and the Parties shall call 1-877-336-1831 at the appointed time, and when prompted for the access code, enter 7039387# to participate in the Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 9/16/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone reset for 11/18/2020 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (dt) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT re #7 MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Thomas Ward. (Weinman, Michael) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Thomas Ward. (Weinman, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/18/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/23/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (mg) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Venture Express, Inc. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael L. Weinman. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Venture Express, Inc. (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3196429), filed by Thomas Ward. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ward v. Venture Express, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Ward | |
| Represented By: | Michael L. Weinman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Venture Express, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
