Gratton v. Cochran
| Paul Gratton |
| Donald Q. Cochran |
| 3:2020cv00742 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Dean Atyia terminated. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/7/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Donald Q. Cochran. (Wildasin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 5
RECEIPT #34675060073 in the amount of $400.00 posted by Paul Gratton re #1 Complaint. (am)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Dean Atyia on behalf of Donald Q. Cochran (Atyia, Dean)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Paul Gratton, a pro se Tennessee resident, filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus under 28 U.S.C. 1361. (Doc. No. 1). This action cannot proceed, however, until Gratton resolves thematter of the filing fee. Gratton MUST either pay the full $400.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in this Court without prepaying fees and costs. Gratton's submission must be received in this Court within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket and include the assigned case number, 3:20-cv-00742. Gratton may request more time to comply before the deadline expires, if necessary. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Gratton a blank Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Gratton is warned that, if he does not follow these instructions within the required time period, the Court will dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Gratton also must keep the Court informed of his current address at all times. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/3/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. )(Pro se party sent IFP (long) form by regular mail.) (am)
|
|
$5 filing fee returned to Plaintiff, so that he can submit the full filing fee of $400 or file the IFP. (am)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am)
|
|
NOTICE mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (am)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against Donald Q. Cochran, filed by Paul Gratton. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(am)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gratton v. Cochran | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Gratton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Donald Q. Cochran | |
| Represented By: | Dean Atyia |
| Represented By: | Mark H. Wildasin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
