Castro v. Fire Door Solutions, LLC
| James Castro |
| Fire Door Solutions, LLC doing business as Life Safety Compliance Solutions, a limited liability company, |
| 3:2020cv00753 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause filed by Fire Door Solutions, LLC. (Hull, Daniel) Modified Text on 10/27/2020 (am).
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause filed by James Castro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sardeye v. Walmart, #2 Exhibit Doe v. University of Tennessee, #3 Exhibit Corizon Health v. Armor Correctional)(Cosby, Tyler)
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM in Support of #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause filed by Fire Door Solutions, LLC . (Hull, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause by Fire Door Solutions, LLC. (Hull, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #6 Motion to Dismiss. On September 9, 2020, Defendant filed a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause. (Doc. No. 6.) Defendant has not filed an Answer to the Complaint. On September 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8) pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B), which provides that [a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within... 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b). Because the First Amended Complaint is now the legally operative complaint in this case, see Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 30607 (6th Cir. 2000), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is rendered moot and is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to it being re-filed to address the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/1/2020. (am)
|
|
Filing 10
REPLY to Response to re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause filed by Fire Door Solutions, LLC. (Hull, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause filed by James Castro. (Cosby, Tyler)
|
|
Filing 8
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by James Castro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - July 21, 2020 Letter)(Dennen, Keith) Modified Text on 9/22/2020 (am).
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause filed by Fire Door Solutions, LLC . (Hull, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss and Enforce the Parties' Forum Selection Clause by Fire Door Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Kansas Complaint)(Hull, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/4/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/10/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (am)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am)
|
|
(Admitted to TN State Bar and TNMD) State Bar status verified as active for Keith C. Dennen, Daniel P. Hull, James Gerard Stranch, IV. (am)
|
|
Filing 2
BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Fire Door Solutions, LLC. (am)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Fire Door Solutions, LLC from Sumner County Chancery Court, case number 83CH1-2020-CV-82against (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3208419), (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint from TN State Court, #3 Exhibit B - Service Papers re Complaint for TN, #4 Exhibit C - State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit D - KS SOS Information)(am) Modified Text on 9/3/2020 (am).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Castro v. Fire Door Solutions, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fire Door Solutions, LLC doing business as Life Safety Compliance Solutions, a limited liability company, | |
| Represented By: | James Gerard Stranch, IV |
| Represented By: | Daniel P. Hull |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Castro | |
| Represented By: | Keith C. Dennen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
