Tennessee Prisoners, et al. v. James, et al.
Anthony Hervey, Tennessee Prisoners and Marvin Green |
Taurean James |
3:2020cv00774 |
September 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The motion (Doc. No. #4 ) is DENIED. Nevertheless, in deference to the apparent intent of all Plaintiffs (and the expressed intent of Plaintiff Green) that these three pleadings comprise one complaint, the Court will unify these cases as follows: the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaints in Cases 774 and 775 on the record in Case 773, where all three opening pleadings may together be considered as Plaintiffs' operative pleading, and to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE Cases 774 and 775. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/26/2020. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Consolidate by Marvin Green. (dt) |
Filing 3 Notice mailed to pro se parties regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Taurean James, filed by Tennessee Prisoners, Marvin Green and Anthony Hervey. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.