Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company and The Cincinnati Casualty Company
Case Number: 3:2020cv00776
Filed: September 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Referring Judge: Alistair Newbern
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The litigation schedule in this matter has been coordinated with multiple related actions (Doc. No. #10 ). Accordingly, the initial case management set for November 3, 2020 (Doc. No. #5 ), is CANCELLED. A full litigation schedule will be set in the case management conference held in the related matters on February 9, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 10/27/2020. (mg)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: By no later than November 13, 2020, Defendants shall file any motions to dismiss or amend any pending motions to dismiss in the Restaurant Actions. Defendants shall file any motion to dismiss the Dentistry Action by November 27, 2020. A telephonic case management conference is set on February 9, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 10/26/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC. The Department of Commerce and Insurance was served September 24, 2020, on behalf of the Cincinnati Indemnity Company. (mg)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC. The Department of Commerce and Insurance was served September 24, 2020, on behalf of the Cincinnati Casualty Company. (mg)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC. The Department of Commerce and Insurance was served September 24, 2020, on behalf of the Cincinnati Insurance Company. (mg)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(h). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/14/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/3/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (mg)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons issued as to The Cincinnati Casualty Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company, The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Cincinnati Casualty Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company, The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3211867), filed by Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - (Collective) - Executive Orders 18, 25, 31, #2 Exhibit 2 - (Collective) - Executive Orders 22, 27, #3 Exhibit 3 - Denial Ltr, #4 Exhibit 4 - Gaston & Murrell Insurance Policy, #5 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Thomas Roe Frazer, II, and Patrick D. McMurtray. (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Cincinnati Indemnity Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Cincinnati Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gaston & Murrell Family Dentistry, PLLC
Represented By: Thomas Roe Frazer, II
Represented By: Patrick D. McMurtray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?