Taylor v. State of Tennessee et al
| Caleb A. Taylor |
| State of Tennessee, Kristen Smith, (f/n/u) Radtke, (f/n/u) Hunter, (f/n/u) Mauldin, Jennette Rice, Sgt. (f/n/u) Winslow, Kathryn Strong, District Attorney for Criminal Court, (f/n/u) Gambina, f/n/u Silvers, f/n/u Carter and David Dee Gay |
| 3:2020cv00888 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Represent New Evidence by Caleb A. Taylor. (jm) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT re: #8 Order Dismissing Case. (xc:Pro se party by certified mail.) (xc: Order mailed to Warden.) (kc) |
Filing 8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff lacks sufficient financial resources from which to pay the full filing fee in advance. Therefore, his application is granted. Plaintiff is assessed the full $350 filing fee. For the reasons explained more fully in the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, the Court finds that a review of the complaint's allegations is barred by issue and claim preclusion. This action, therefore, is DISMISSED. Because an appeal would NOT be taken in good faith, Plaintiff is NOT certified to pursue an appeal from this judgment in forma pauperis. This is the final order denying all relief in this case. The Clerk SHALL enter judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(b). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/12/2020. (xc:Pro se party by certified mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/12/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Trust Account Statement by Caleb A. Taylor. (vh) |
| Filing 5 VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS by Caleb A. Taylor. (vh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Caleb A. Taylor, an inmate of the Sumner County Jail in Gallatin, Tennessee, filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff also submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. #2 ). This case, however, cannot proceed without further action by Plaintiff. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to do one of the following within 30 days of the date he receives this Order: either return to the district court a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2); or submit the full civil filing fee to the Clerk of Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/26/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (vh) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (vh) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Caleb A. Taylor. (vh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against f/n/u Carter, District Attorney for Criminal Court, (f/n/u) Gambina, David Dee Gay, (f/n/u) Hunter, (f/n/u) Mauldin, (f/n/u) Radtke, Jennette Rice, f/n/u Silvers, Kristen Smith, State of Tennessee, Kathryn Strong, and (f/n/u) Winslow, filed by Caleb A. Taylor.(vh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
