Nash v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Sarah Elizabeth Nash |
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
SSA-Email Notification |
3:2020cv00908 |
October 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Alistair Newbern |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Elizabeth Nash. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 11/17/2020. (hb) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney on 11/17/2020. (jm) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed as to U.S. Attorney General, served on 11/27/2020. (jm) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to SSA-Email Notification, Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (forwarded to USM for service.)(kc) Modified text on 11/12/2020 (kc). Modified on 11/13/2020 (hb). |
Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff Sarah Elizabeth Nash has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 6). Having considered Nash's application, the Court ORDERS that Nash be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. The Clerk's Office is directed to file the case and send copies to the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee and the Attorney General of the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 11/10/2020. (kc) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis re: #4 Order . (Williamson, Michael) Modified on 11/9/2020 (vh). |
Filing 5 ***DISREGARD ENTERED IN ERROR**** ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as it is not the appropriate form. The appropriate Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Form AO 239 (long form) can be found on this Court's website. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/30/2020. (kc) Modified on 10/30/2020 (kc). |
Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as it is not the appropriate form. The appropriate Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Form AO 239 (long form) can be found on this Court's website. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/28/2020. (kc) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/30/2020) (kc). |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Sarah Elizabeth Nash. (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, filed by Sarah Elizabeth Nash.(kc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/22/2020: #1 Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kc). |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael Patrick Williamson admitted to this court. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.