Brunelle v. CoCo's Italian Market et al
Plaintiff: Richard Rene Brunelle
Defendant: CoCo's Italian Market and Charles Cinelli
Case Number: 3:2020cv00982
Filed: November 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Alistair Newbern
Referring Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Summons re-issued as to Charles Cinelli and CoCo's Italian Market. (Service copies sent to pro se plaintiff by regular mail.) (jm)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Plaintiff Richard Brunelle requests that new summonses be issued for Defendants CoCo's Italian Market and Charles Cinelli. (Doc. No. #10 .) The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to reissue the summonses originally issued on November 16, 2020, and to provide them to Brunelle. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 1/11/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (jm)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Richard Rene Brunelle re #9 Order. (am)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Plaintiff called to inform the court regarding the COVID green card delivery procedure. (am)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. Brunelle is warned that failure to effect service of process in compliance with Rule 4 within 90 days of filing his complaint may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 12/22/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Charles Cinelli, CoCo's Italian Market. USPS tracking indicates that the summons has been in transit since 11/29/2020 with no delivery confirmed. (am)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. Accordingly, there is no initial screening of the complaint. See Benson v. OBrian, 179 F.3d 1014, 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (holding that the frivolity screening requirement of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) applies only to in forma pauperis proceedings). This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/3/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Charles Cinelli, CoCo's Italian Market, filed by Richard Rene Brunelle.(am)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Accordingly, to proceed in this matter, the plaintiff MUST submit an amended complaint that provides all relevant factual allegations in support of the stated claims. The Clerk SHALL send the plaintiff a blank form complaint for employment discrimination. The plaintiff must submit the amended complaint within 30 DAYS of the date this order is entered on the docket. Failure to comply with this order, or seek an extension of time, by the deadline may result in the complaint being dismissed. The plaintiff must also keep the court apprised of his mailing address. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/18/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. )(Pro se party sent blank complaint form by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RECEIPT #34675060640 in the amount of $400.00 posted by Richard Rene Brunelle re #1 Complaint. (am)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons issued as to Charles Cinelli and CoCo's Italian Market. Service copies returned to Plaintiff by mail. Modified on 11/16/2020 (ln).
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Cinelli and CoCo's Italian Market (Filing fee $400 paid) filed by Richard Rene Brunelle. (Attachments: #1 - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 - Right to Sue Letter). (ln)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included). (ln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brunelle v. CoCo's Italian Market et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Rene Brunelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CoCo's Italian Market
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Cinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?