Nagarajan v. Tennessee State University
| Govindaswamy Nagarajan |
| Tennessee State University |
| 3:2020cv01074 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/27/2020. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 6 RECEIPT #34675061204 in the amount of $402.00 posted by Govindaswamy Nagarajan re #1 Complaint. (ln) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Submission of the full $402.00 Civil Filing Fee filed by Govindaswamy Nagarajan re #4 Order. (dt) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is Denied without prejudice to filing a properly completed application. To proceed in this action, Plaintiff MUST submit either (1) the full $402.00 civil filing fee to the Clerk of Court; or (2) an amended application to proceed as a pauper that contains fully-completed responses to all questions, following the instructions on the form and leaving no blanks. Plaintiff's submission must be received by the Court within 30 DAYS of the date of entry of this Order. The Clerk SHALL mail Plaintiff ablank Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Costs or Fees for non-prisoners, for Plaintiff's use in preparing an amended application. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 12/21/2020. (xc: Pro se party w/ IFP by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (dt) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Govindaswamy Nagarajan. (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tennessee State University, filed by Govindaswamy Nagarajan. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nagarajan v. Tennessee State University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Govindaswamy Nagarajan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tennessee State University | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
