Techmatic, Inc. v. Plating Specialists, Inc. et al
| Techmatic, Inc. |
| Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., Hendrik Greve, Barry Schroer and Patrick Murphy |
| 3:2020cv01078 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1961 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Techmatic, Inc.. (Morgan, Russell) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Mark Everett Hunt and Kyle David Watlington admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, by Hendrik Greve, Patrick Murphy, Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., Barry Schroer.(Hunt, Mark) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of #12 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by Hendrik Greve, Patrick Murphy, Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., Barry Schroer . (Hunt, Mark) |
| Filing 12 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Hendrik Greve, Patrick Murphy, Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., Barry Schroer. (Hunt, Mark) |
Filing 11
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 1/27/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Hendrik Greve, Patrick Murphy, Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., Barry Schroer. (Hunt, Mark) Modified on 1/26/2021 (vh). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 12/31/2020. (jm)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Hendrik Greve, Patrick Murphy, Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., Barry Schroer. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Hunt, Mark) |
| Filing 6 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Techmatic, Inc.. (Morgan, Russell) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Hendrik Greve, Patrick Murphy, Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., and Barry Schroer. (Service copies returned to counsel by regular mail.) (jm) (Main Document 5 replaced on 12/18/2020) (jm). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/2/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (jm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (jm) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Russell B. Morgan, Jeffrey W. Sheehan admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 7 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Techmatic, Inc. (jm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hendrik Greve, Patrick Murphy, Michael O'Rourke, Plating Specialists, Inc., and Barry Schroer (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3277984), filed by Techmatic, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Original Schroer Confidentiality, #3 Exhibit B - 2004 Schroer Confidentiality, #4 Exhibit C -Original Murphy Confidentiality, #5 Exhibit D - Second Murphy Confidentiality, #6 Exhibit E - O'Rourke Non-Compete, #7 Exhibit F - O'Rourke Confidentiality, #8 Exhibit G - Greve Non-Compete Agreement, #9 Exhibit H - Greve Confidentiality Agreement, #10 Exhibit I - Pavco CEO's Test Message, #11 Exhibit J - Pavco Letter to Customers, #12 Exhibit K - Techmatic letter to customers)(jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
