Browning v. Franklin Precision Industry, Inc.
| Thomas J. Browning |
| Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv01091 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER: On February 15, 2021, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss with supporting memorandum #14 and #15 . On February 16, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation to transfer venue. The Clerk is directed to forward the motion and stipulation to the Honorable William L. Campbell, Jr., District Judge for his consideration. Given the pending stipulation to transfer venue, the initial case management conference scheduled for February 22, 2021 is CANCELLED, to be reset by later order as appropriate if venue is not transferred. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/17/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION to Transfer Venue by Franklin Precision Industry, Inc.. (Smith, Paul) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support of #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. . (Smith, Paul) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue by Franklin Precision Industry, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Declaration of Kazuhiro Tanimura)(Smith, Paul) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. answer due 2/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/10/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Mark E. Stamelos and Paul Maxwell Smith, III admitted to this court. (kc) |
| Filing 12 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Franklin Precision Industry, Inc.. (Smith, Paul) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond by Franklin Precision Industry, Inc.. (Smith, Paul) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Thomas J. Browning. Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. served on 1/11/2021. (Blackburn, W.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Maxwell Smith, III on behalf of Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. (Smith, Paul) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark E. Stamelos on behalf of Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. (Stamelos, Mark) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Given the current responses to the outbreak of the coronavirus known as COVID-19, including the Court's Administrative Order No. 209 amended on January 12, 2021, the initial case management conference in this case, scheduled for 9:30 a.m. on February 22, 2021, will be held telephonically. Counsel should use the following dial-in information1 to participate in the telephonic initial case management conference: Dial-in number: 877-402-9753, Access Code: 3808663#. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/27/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/22/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. (Service copies mailed to counsel.) (kc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference is set for 2/22/2021 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (kc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3279756), filed by Thomas J. Browning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Bryant B. Kroll and W. Gary Blackburn admitted to this court. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Browning v. Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas J. Browning | |
| Represented By: | Bryant B. Kroll |
| Represented By: | W. Gary Blackburn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mark E. Stamelos |
| Represented By: | Paul Maxwell Smith, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
