Smart Communications Holding, Inc. v. VendEngine, Inc.
| Smart Communications Holding, Inc. |
| VendEngine, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00053 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Patent |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING TO STATE COURT. (ln)
|
|
Filing 30
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING TO STATE COURT. (ln)
|
|
Filing 29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING TO STATE COURT: For the reasons discussed herein, the Court will grant the Motion (Doc. No. #14 ). The Clerk is DIRECTED to remand the case to the Chancery Court of Davidson County. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/30/2023. (xc: Certified copy of Order mailed to Davidson Co. Chancery Court via certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE by Smart Communications Holding, Inc. of Withdrawal of Counsel (Barger, Keane)
|
|
Filing 27
NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Charles C. McLaurin on behalf of VendEngine, Inc.. (McLaurin, Charles)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER: In light of Plaintiff's response (Doc. No. #25 ) to Defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. No. #9 ) and Defendant's indication that is does not request restriction of public access to the document (see Doc. No. #9 at 1), Defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. No. #9 ) is DENIED, and the Clerk shall unseal Doc. No. #10 . Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 04/01/2021. (ln)
|
|
Filing 25
RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal filed by Smart Communications Holding, Inc.. (Barger, Keane)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER: Pending before the Court, among other things, is Defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. No. #9 , Motion). Plaintiff shall file a response to the Motion by April 9, 2021, indicating whether it contends that these documents should remain under seal and, if so, how it carries its burden of meeting the requirements of Local Rule 5.03(a). See Local Rule 5.03(b). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 3/26/2021. (ln)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Change of Address by Anthony F. Schlehuber (Schlehuber, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER: The Initial Case Management Conference set for March 23, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. is CANCELLED. The Conference will be rescheduled, if necessary, after the Court rules on the Motion to Remand (Docket No. #14 ). Please contact the undersigned's chambers to reschedule within fourteen (14) days of a ruling on the Motion if necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 3/15/2021. (vh)
|
|
Filing 21
REPLY to Response to re #14 MOTION to Remand filed by Smart Communications Holding, Inc.. (Reynolds, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 20
RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Remand filed by VendEngine, Inc. (Schlehuber, Anthony) Modified on 3/1/2021 (vh).
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER: The Parties' Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadlines #18 is GRANTED. Defendant VendEngine, Inc. shall have up to and including February 26, 2021 to respond to Plaintiff Smart Communications Holding, Inc.'s motion for remand #14 and Plaintiff shall have up to and including March 8, 2021 to reply. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 2/23/2021. (vh)
|
|
Filing 18
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by VendEngine, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1- Proposed Order)(Schlehuber, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Joint Motion to Stay until Ruling on Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 2/17/2021. (vh)
|
|
Filing 16
Joint MOTION to Stay by Smart Communications Holding, Inc.. (Barger, Keane)
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM in Support of #14 MOTION to Remand filed by Smart Communications Holding, Inc. . (Barger, Keane)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Remand by Smart Communications Holding, Inc.. (Barger, Keane)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: After consultation with Judge Eli Richardson, this action is TRANSFERRED to Judge Richardson as an earlier-filed related case to HLFIP Holding, Inc. v Rutherford County, Tennessee, et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-00714. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 2/1/2021. (vh)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Hearing re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by VendEngine, Inc.. (Ramage, Wayne)
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION of Anthony Schlehuber filed by VendEngine, Inc. re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B- US Patent 10291617, #2 Exhibit C- US Patent Application 15153171)(Ramage, Wayne)
|
|
Filing 10
Sealed Document filed by VendEngine, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- NDA)(Ramage, Wayne)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by VendEngine, Inc.. (Ramage, Wayne)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by VendEngine, Inc.. (Ramage, Wayne)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER of Reference to Magistrate Judge. This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 1/27/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by VendEngine, Inc. re #2 Business Entity Disclosure Statement (Ramage, Wayne)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/23/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (vh)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (vh)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (vh)
|
|
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#2 : Pursuant to Local Rule 5.01, Certificates of Service shall identify by name the person served, what was served, the method of service, and date of service. Counsel did not include a certificate of service. Please FILE a conformed Certificate of Service for this document. (vh)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Gregory S. Reynolds, Keane A. Barger, Wayne Edward Ramage, Anthony F. Schlehuber admitted to this court. (vh)
|
|
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Katrina M. Quicker, Kevin P. Flynn: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 2/16/2021. (vh)
|
|
State Bar status verified as active for (GA) Katrina M. Quicker, (OH) Kevin P. Flynn not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (vh)
|
|
Filing 2
BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by VendEngine, Inc. (vh)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by VendEngine, Inc. from Chancery Court for Davidson County, Tennessee, case number 20-1281-I. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0650-3300140) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - remaining state docs, #3 Exhibit C - 714 Rutherford Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - 111 First Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - 111 Second Amended Complaint, #6 Exhibit F - Motion to Consolidate, #7 Exhibit G - 714 VE Complaint, #8 Exhibit H - Notice to State Court and cover letter, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(vh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
