Doe v. Tucker et al
| John Doe |
| Town of Smyrna, Tennessee and Andrew Tucker |
| 3:2021cv00088 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by John Doe. (Mothershead, Kyle) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Robert M. Burns and Samantha A. Foster admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 26 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Andrew Tucker.(Foster, Samantha) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha A. Foster on behalf of Andrew Tucker (Foster, Samantha) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Burns on behalf of Andrew Tucker (Burns, Robert) |
Filing 23
ORDER: This matter is set for an initial case management conference on April 5, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. (Doc. No. #4 .) The conference will be held by telephone. Counsel for each party shall call (888) 557-8511 and enter access code 7819165# to participate. Counsel need not and should not appear in person. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 3/19/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 22 CORRECTED RESPONSE Memorandum in Opposition filed by Town of Smyrna, Tennessee to Plaintiff's #7 Motion to Proceed Under A Pseudonym. (jm) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER: The parties have filed a joint motion to strike Defendant Town of Smyrna, Tennessee's response in opposition to Plaintiff John Doe's motion to proceed under a pseudonym because that filing inadvertently revealed information that is the subject of Plaintiff's motion (Doc. No. #20 ). The joint motion (Doc. No. #20 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to strike the Town's erroneous response from the Court's docket (Doc. No. 15 ) and enter the corrected filing (Doc. No. 20-1) as a separate docket entry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 3/16/2021. (jm)
|
| Filing 20 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 15 Response in Opposition to Motion and Replace With Corrected Version by Town of Smyrna, Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Town's Corrected Memorandum)(Foster, Samantha) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Town of Smyrna, Tennessee.(Foster, Samantha) |
| Filing 18 REPLY to Response to re #7 MOTION PERMISSION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM AND PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by John Doe. (Mothershead, Kyle) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Jeffrey L. Peach admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS returned executed by John Doe. Andrew Tucker served on 3/4/2021. (Mothershead, Kyle) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS returned executed by John Doe. Town of Smyrna, Tennessee served on 2/22/2021. (Mothershead, Kyle) |
| Filing 15 (STRICKEN PER #21 ORDER - SEE DE #22 ) RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION PERMISSION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM AND PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Town of Smyrna, Tennessee. (Foster, Samantha) Modified on 3/16/2021 (jm). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey L. Peach on behalf of Town of Smyrna, Tennessee (Peach, Jeffrey) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Robert M. Burns, Samantha A. Foster admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha A. Foster on behalf of Town of Smyrna, Tennessee (Foster, Samantha) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Burns on behalf of Town of Smyrna, Tennessee (Burns, Robert) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal. Should the Court deny plaintiff's pending motion to proceed under a pseudonym, the Court may unseal this filing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 2/19/2021. (jm)
|
| Filing 10 Sealed Document filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A_Declaration, #2 Exhibit B_Expungement Orders, #3 Exhibit C_Tucker Personnel Excerpt)(Mothershead, Kyle) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by John Doe. (Mothershead, Kyle) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of #7 MOTION PERMISSION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM AND PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by John Doe . (Mothershead, Kyle) |
| Filing 7 MOTION PERMISSION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM AND PROTECTIVE ORDER by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Mothershead, Kyle) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 2/8/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Town of Smyrna, Tennessee and Andrew Tucker. (Service copies sent to counsel by regular mail.) (jm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/5/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (jm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (jm) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Kyle F. Mothershead admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Town of Smyrna, Tennessee and Andrew Tucker (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3308602), filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet) (jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
