Morgan v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee et al
| Gerald Dean Morgan |
| Sandra Garrett and Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee |
| 3:2021cv00274 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TN State Bar status verified as active for David M. Rudolph admitted to this court. (dt)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion #11 for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss no later than June 7, 2021. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/12/2021. (ln)
|
|
Filing 11
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim by Gerald Dean Morgan. (Blackburn, W.)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Change of Address by David M. Rudolph (Rudolph, David)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim by Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Sandra Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 1 Brian Manookian v. BPR, Petitioner Manookian's Motion to Disqualify, #3 Exhibit 2 Memorandum re: Separation of Employment dated 12/11/2020)(Rudolph, David)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Rudolph on behalf of All Defendants (Rudolph, David)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS returned executed by Gerald Dean Morgan. Sandra Garrett served on 4/14/2021. (Blackburn, W.)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS returned executed by Gerald Dean Morgan. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee served on 4/12/2021. (Blackburn, W.)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons issued as to Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee and Sandra Garrett. (Service copies returned to counsel by mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(h). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/6/21. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 6/10/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (dt)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for W. Gary Blackburn and Bryant B. Kroll admitted to this court. (dt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Sandra Garrett (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3346143), filed by Gerald Dean Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Memorandum from Ms. Holliday, #2 Exhibit B: Response in Opposition to Motion to Disqualify, #3 Exhibit C: Letter from Sandra Garret, #4 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(dt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
