Membreno v. Holloway
| Marco Julio Membreno |
| James Michael Holloway |
| 3:2021cv00345 |
| April 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM in Support of #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by James Michael Holloway . (Attachments: #1 Attachment USDC Opinion)(Bledsoe, John)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss by James Michael Holloway. (Bledsoe, John)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Filing by James Michael Holloway State Court Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Davidson County Technical Record)(Bledsoe, John)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Marco Julio Membreno, an inmate at DeBerry Special Needs Facility in Nashville, Tennessee, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. No. #1 ) and has paid the filing fee. (Doc. No. #4 .) Because it is not readily apparent from the face of the petition that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief on this claim, Respondent is DIRECTED to file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the petition in accordance with Habeas Rule 5 within 30 days of the entry of this Order. Petitioner may file a reply to Respondent's answer limited to disputing specific points of fact or law raised by the answer within 30 days of the date the answer is filed. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the petition and this Order by mail on the Attorney General of Tennessee. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 5/24/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail, Respondent by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
|
|
Filing 5
VACATE AND RELIEVE OF SENTENCE filed by Marco Julio Membreno. (dt)
|
|
Filing 4
RECEIPT #34675062250 in the amount of $5.00 posted by Marco Julio Membreno re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ln)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for John H. Bledsoe, III admitted to this court. (vh)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Bledsoe, III on behalf of James Michael Holloway (Bledsoe, John)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (vh)
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (vh)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (fee not paid), filed by Marco Julio Membreno.(vh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Membreno v. Holloway | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marco Julio Membreno | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: James Michael Holloway | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
