Grooms v. Walden Security et al
Plaintiff: Belinda Mary Grooms
Defendant: Toni Crocker and Walden Security
Case Number: 3:2021cv00363
Filed: May 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Alistair Newbern
Referring Judge: Eli J Richardson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons issued as to Walden Security. Service copies forwarded to U.S. Marshals to effect service. (ln)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Because Grooms' application (Doc. No. #2 ) reflects that she lacks sufficient financial resources to pay the full filing fee in advance without undue hardship, it is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Grooms one service packet. Grooms MUST complete one service packet for Walden Security and return the completed service packet to the Clerk's Office within 21 DAYS of the date this order is entered on the docket. Upon return of the completed service packet, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. Defendant Crocker is DISMISSED from this action. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 6/3/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with one service packet.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 6/3/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included). (ln)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Belinda Mary Grooms. (ln)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Toni Crocker and Walden Security filed by Belinda Mary Grooms. (ln) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/5/2021) (ln).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grooms v. Walden Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toni Crocker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walden Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Belinda Mary Grooms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?