Silva v. 13 Management et al
| Daniel James Silva |
| Judge William L. Campbell, Jr., Judge Joe Binkley, Judge Eli J. Richardson, Andrea Finley Swift, 13 Management, Neal and Harwell and Taylor Alison Swift |
| 3:2021cv00480 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1951 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Silva's pro se Amended Complaint pursues claims against three Defendants: 13 Management, Neal and Harwell, and Taylor Alison Swift. (Doc. No. #9 ). Because Silva has added Taylor Alison Swift as a Defendant, the Amended Complaint plainly violates the terms of June 18 Injunction. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Clerk for the Northern District of Florida for filing in Silva v. Swift, No. 419CV286-RH-MJF (N.D. Fla.), and for consideration of any further action pursuant to the June 18 Injunction. Silva is CAUTIONED that future disregard of the June 18 Injunction in this district may be viewed as vexatious behavior or subject Silva to sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/22/2021. (xc:Pro se party and Clerk for the Northern District of Florida by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Daniel James Silva. (kc) Modified on 7/20/2021 (kc). |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against 13 Management, Neal and Harwell and Taylor Alison Swift, filed by Daniel James Silva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - M) (kc) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Filing: BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Daniel James Silva. (kc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Silva has not provided sufficient information for the Court to make an accurate undue hardship determination. Silva's applications to proceed as a pauper (Case No. 3:21-480 #2 ; Case No. 3:21-505 #2 ) are therefore DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of an amended application. In each case Silva MUST submit either (1) an amended application to proceed as a pauper, or (2) the full $402.00 civil filing fee to the Clerk of Court. In each case Silva MUST submit an Amended Complaint. The Clerk SHALL mail Silva two blank long-form in forma pauperis applications for non-prisoners and two blank form complaints for a civil case (Pro Se 1). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/13/2021. (xc: Order, 2 IFP long forms and 2 non prisoner Complaint forms forwarded to Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Daniel James Silva. (kc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 13 Management, Joe Binkley, William L. Campbell, Jr, Neal and Harwell, Eli J. Richardson, and Andrea Finley Swift, filed by Daniel James Silva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-I) (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
