Ogbonna-McGruder v. Austin Peay State University
| Chinyere Ogbonna-McGruder |
| Austin Peay State University |
| 3:2021cv00506 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER: The motion #16 is granted. The response is due on or before October 1, 2021. Any reply is due on or before October 8, 2021. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/27/2021. (ln)
|
|
Filing 16
Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Chinyere Ogbonna-McGruder. (Mumford, Roland)
|
|
Filing 15
PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by All Plaintiffs. (Mumford, Roland)
|
|
NY State Bar status verified as active for Toni-Ann M. Buono admitted to this court. (ln)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Toni-Ann M. Buono on behalf of Austin Peay State University (Buono, Toni-Ann)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: The motion #12 for Extension to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted. The response is due on or before September 1, 2021. Any reply is due on or before September 13, 2021. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/9/2021. (ln)
|
|
Filing 12
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Chinyere Ogbonna-McGruder. (Mumford, Roland)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: On August 4, 2021, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss with supporting memorandum (Docket Entry Nos. #8 , #9 ). Any response by Plaintiff shall be filed pursuant to Rule 12, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Local Rule 7.01(a)(3). An optional reply may be filed pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(a) (4). The Clerk is directed to forward the motions to the Honorable Eli J. Richardson, District Judge for his consideration of the motion to dismiss. Unless otherwise ordered, the telephonic initial case management conference remains scheduled for August 23, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. (see Docket Entry No. #5 for dial-in details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 8/6/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS returned executed by Chinyere Ogbonna-McGruder. Austin Peay State University served on 7/14/2021. (Mumford, Roland)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for E. Ashley Carter admitted to this court. (ln)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM in Support of #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Austin Peay State University . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Notice of Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit September 23, 2020 LTR re EEOC Charge, #3 Exhibit Morris v. APSU, Memorandum Opinion and Order)(Carter, E.)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Austin Peay State University. (Carter, E.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/6/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons issued as to Austin Peay State University (Herbert Slatery). Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (ln)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 8/23/2021 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ln)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ln)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ln)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Roland F. Mumford admitted to this court. (ln)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Austin Peay State University (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3402597) filed by Chinyere Ogbonna-McGruder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC letter and drafted charge, #2 Exhibit B - First signed EEOC charge 09250, #3 Exhibit C - second signed EEOC charge 01993, #4 Exhibit D - first right to sue letter 09250, #5 Exhibit E - second right to sue letter 01993, #6 Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet)(ln)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ogbonna-McGruder v. Austin Peay State University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chinyere Ogbonna-McGruder | |
| Represented By: | Roland F. Mumford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Austin Peay State University | |
| Represented By: | E. Ashley Carter |
| Represented By: | Toni-Ann M. Buono |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
