Bush et al v. Reliant Bank et al
Dr. Byron V. Bush and Kelly Diane Bush |
Reliant Bank, DeVan D. Ard, Jr., Rick Belote, Judge James G. Martin, III, Frank G. Clement, Steven J. Stafford, Reliant Bancorp, Inc. and William Ronald DeBerry |
3:2021cv00525 |
July 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Eli J Richardson |
Contract: Other |
29 U.S.C. § 1109 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 SUMMONS returned executed as to Reliant Bank served on 8/16/2021. (vh) |
Filing 22 SUMMONS returned executed as to Rick Belote served on 8/16/2021. (vh) |
Filing 21 SUMMONS returned executed as Frank G. Clement served on 8/12/2021. (vh) |
Filing 20 SUMMONS returned executed as to Reliant Bancorp, Inc. served on 8/12/2021. (vh) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS returned executed as to Steven J. Stafford served on 8/12/2021. (vh) |
Filing 18 ORDER: On July 15, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why the Court had subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this case. (Doc. No. #9 .) The Court directed Plaintiffs to submit an amended complaint that "describe[d] what federal law or part of the U.S. Constitution gives rise to their claim." Plaintiffs submitted an Amended Complaint that fails to comply with the Court's Order. (Doc. No. #16 .) Because pro se Plaintiffs made an attempt to comply with the Court's Order, however, the Court will allow one final opportunity to address these concerns. To do so, Plaintiffs MUST submit a second amended complaint within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. The Clerk SHALL mail Plaintiffs a blank form Complaint for a Civil Case (Pro Se 1). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/20/2021. (xc:Pro se parties by regular mail along with two blank Complaints for a Civil case.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Summons issued as to William Ronald DeBerry per DE #17 . (vh) |
Filing 17 Summons issued as to DeVan D. Ard, Jr, Rick Belote, Frank G. Clement, James G. Martin, III, Reliant Bancorp, Inc., Reliant Bank, Steven J. Stafford, and William Ronald DeBerry. (vh). Modified on 8/11/2021 (vh). |
Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT For INDEPENDENT ACTION "arising under" FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION against DeVan D. Ard, Jr, Rick Belote, Frank G. Clement, James G. Martin, III, Reliant Bank, Steven J. Stafford, Reliant Bancorp, Inc., and William Ronald DeBerry, filed by Kelly Diane Bush and Byron V. Bush.(vh) Modified on 8/11/2021 (vh). |
Filing 15 SUMMONS returned executed as to Rick Belote served on 7/16/2021. (vh) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS returned executed as to Steven J. Stafford served on 7/21/2021. (vh) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS returned executed as to Frank G. Clement served on 7/16/2021. (vh) |
Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to DeVan D. Ard, Jr. (vh) |
Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to James G. Martin, III. (vh) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed as to Reliant Bank served on 7/13/2021. (vh) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Plaintiffs Dr. Byron V. Bush and Kelly Diane Bush filed a pro se Complaint for fraud against Reliant Bank, several Reliant employees, and three Tennessee judges. (Doc. No. #1 .) It is not clearly apparent that the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this case. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction in this case by submitting an Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs MUST submit the Amended Complaint, or request an extension of time, within 30 DAYS of the date of entry of this Order. Plaintiffs are warned that failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the Complaint without prejudice. The Clerk SHALL mail Plaintiffs a blank form Complaint for a Civil Case (Pro Se 1). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/15/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail w/blank complaint form. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh) |
Filing 8 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Reliant Bank. (Montgomery, Stephen) |
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#7 : The form for the Business Entity Disclosure Statement was not used. Counsel shall re-file the document using the form on the Court's website under the Forms section. Counsel shall use the event Business Entity Disclosure Statement under Other Documents when filing this document. (vh) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Stephen M. Montgomery admitted to this court. (vh) |
Filing 7 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Reliant Bank. (Montgomery, Stephen) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen M. Montgomery on behalf of DeVan D. Ard, Jr, Rick Belote, Reliant Bank (Montgomery, Stephen) |
Filing 5 Summons issued as to DeVan D. Ard, Jr, Rick Belote, Frank G. Clement, James G. Martin, III, Reliant Bank, and Steven J. Stafford. (jm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (vh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (vh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (vh) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (vh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DeVan D. Ard, Jr, Rick Belote, Frank G. Clement, James G. Martin, III, Reliant Bank, and Steven J. Stafford (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 34675062959), filed by Kelly Diane Bush and Byron V. Bush. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Documents)(vh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.