Hernandez v. Genovese
| Christopher N. Hernandez |
| Kevin Genovese |
| 3:2021cv00584 |
| July 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Nicholas S. Bolduc admitted to this court. (dt)
|
|
Filing 15
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Kevin Genovese.(Bolduc, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Filing by Kevin Genovese (Attachments: #1 Attachment Technical Record on Post-Conviction Appeal, #2 Attachment Supplemental Technical Record on Post-Conviction Appeal, #3 Attachment Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing Vol. I on Post-Conviction Appeal, #4 Attachment Exhibit introduced at Evidentiary Hearing on Post-Conviction Appeal, #5 Attachment Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing Vol. II on Post-Conviction Appeal, #6 Attachment Brief of Appellant on Post-Conviction Appeal, #7 Attachment Brief of State on Post-Conviction Appeal, #8 Attachment Reply Brief of Appellant on Post-Conviction Appeal, #9 Attachment Opinion of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Post-Conviction Appeal, #10 Attachment Application for Discretionary Review on Post-Conviction Appeal, #11 Attachment Order Denying Discretionary Review on Post-Conviction Appeal)(Bolduc, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Austin Nichols terminated. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/9/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (vh)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Kevin Genovese. (Bolduc, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Christopher N. Hernandez, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. No. #1 ) and paid the filing fee (Doc. No. #5 ). Having conducted a preliminary review of the Petition, the Court concludes that Petitioner has satisfied the initial threshold of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases ("Habeas Rules"). Accordingly, Respondent is DIRECTED to file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the Petition in accordance with Habeas Rule 5 within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/6/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail; This order and a copy of the Petition sent to Attorney General of Tennessee by ECF.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (jm)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (jm)
|
|
Filing 7
Case transferred in from the District of Tennessee Western; Case Number 1:21-cv-01104. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/30/2021. (mbm) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 7/30/2021.]
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Austin Nichols admitted to this court. (jm)
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jm)
|
|
Filing 5
Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number M4676049657 (csf) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 7/30/2021.]
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Austin Nichols on behalf of Kevin Genovese (Nichols, Austin) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 7/30/2021.]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY THE $5.00 HABEAS CORPUS FILING FEE. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/19/2021. (mbm) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 7/30/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 7/30/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher N. Hernandez against Kevin Genovese. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Envelope)(csf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/19/2021: #3 Judicial Card) (cdi). [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 7/30/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez v. Genovese | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher N. Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kevin Genovese | |
| Represented By: | Austin Nichols |
| Represented By: | Nicholas S. Bolduc |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
