Doe #7 v. Lee et al
Plaintiff: John Doe #7
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Case Number: 3:2021cv00598
Filed: July 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2021 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Newbern per DE#31 in Lead case 3:21-cv-0590. (bs)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 176, these actions are transferred to Judge Aleta A. Trauger as "Related Cases" to Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-00028. Case reassigned to District Judge Aleta A. Trauger for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/24/2021. (vh)
August 11, 2021 Filing 14 SUMMONS returned executed by John Doe #7. All Defendants. (Yarbrough, Edward)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motions to Deem Cases Related, Reassign, and Consolidate. (Doc. No. 8 in Case No. 3:21-cv-00590; Doc. No. 7 in Case No. 3:21-cv-00593; Doc. No. 7 in Case No. 3:21-cv-00594). These related cases involve common questions of law and fact along with the same Defendants. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the Motions are GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that these cases be CONSOLIDATED for all purposes, except for trial, which is reserved. The consolidated cases shall proceed under Case No. 3:21-cv-00590. All future filings shall be made in the lead case only, No. 3:21-cv-00590. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/10/2021. (jm)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/4/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
August 4, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 9/30/2021 at 10:00 AM in Chambers A845 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (mg)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to Chief Judge Waverly Crenshaw and Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern, as it is related to an earlier-filed case assigned to them, Case Number 3:21-cv-590. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/3/2021. (jm)
August 3, 2021 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of #8 MOTION to Deem Cases Related, Reassign, and Consolidate re #1 Complaint filed by John Doe #7 . (Adams, Walter)
August 3, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Deem Cases Related, Reassign, and Consolidate re #1 Complaint by John Doe #7. (Adams, Walter)
August 2, 2021 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym and for Protective Order re #1 Complaint filed by John Doe #7 . (Adams, Walter)
August 2, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym and for Protective Order re #1 Complaint by John Doe #7. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1-Proposed Order)(Adams, Walter)
August 2, 2021 Filing 5 Summons issued as to William B. Lee and David B. Rausch. (Service copies to be picked up by counsel.) (jm)
July 30, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm)
July 30, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (jm)
July 30, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (jm)
July 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David B. Rausch, William B. Lee (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3420073), filed by David B. Rausch, John Doe #7, William B. Lee. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(jm)
July 30, 2021 TN State Bar status verified as active for Edward M. Yarbrough, Jonathan P. Farmer, and Walter Justin Adams admitted to this court. (jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe #7 v. Lee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe #7
Represented By: Edward M. Yarbrough
Represented By: Jonathan P. Farmer
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William B. Lee
Represented By: Edward M. Yarbrough
Represented By: Jonathan P. Farmer
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David B. Rausch
Represented By: Edward M. Yarbrough
Represented By: Jonathan P. Farmer
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?