Doe #8 v. Lee et al
| John Doe #8 |
| William B. Lee and David B. Rausch |
| 3:2021cv00624 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Newbern per DE#31 in Lead case 3:21-cv-0590. (bs) |
Filing 13
ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 176, these actions are transferred to Judge Aleta A. Trauger as "Related Cases" to Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-00028. Case reassigned to District Judge Aleta A. Trauger for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/24/2021. (vh)
|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS returned executed by John Doe #8. All Defendants. (Adams, Walter) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(h). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/13/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: granting #8 MOTION to Deem Cases Related, Reassign, and Consolidate re #1 Complaint. This case be CONSOLIDATED for all purposes, except for trial, which is reserved, with Case No. 3:21-cv-00590. All future filings shall be made in the lead case only, No. 3:21-cv-00590. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/12/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of #8 MOTION to Deem Cases Related, Reassign, and Consolidate re #1 Complaint filed by John Doe #8 . (Yarbrough, Edward) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Deem Cases Related, Reassign, and Consolidate re #1 Complaint by John Doe #8. (Yarbrough, Edward) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION for Protective Order and to Proceed Under Pseudonym filed by John Doe #8 . (Yarbrough, Edward) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Protective Order and to Proceed Under Pseudonym by John Doe #8. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Yarbrough, Edward) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 9/30/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (dt) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to William B. Lee and David B. Rausch. (Service copies will be picked up by counsel.) (dt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (dt) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Edward M. Yarbrough, Jonathan P. Farmer and Walter Justin Adams admitted to this court. (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William B. Lee and David B. Rausch (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3426367), filed by John Doe #8. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
