Worldbridge Logistics, Inc. v. World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd.
Worldbridge Logistics, Inc. |
World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd. |
3:2021cv00637 |
August 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Barbara D Holmes |
Eli J Richardson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED as to World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd. Service copies will be returned to counsel by regular mail. (ln) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Alias Summons to be Issued as to World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd. (Ferraro, Sarah) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Shanshan Liang to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number 0650-3431549) by Worldbridge Logistics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Dowsley, J.) |
Filing 7 Summons issued as to World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd. Service copies will be picked up by counsel. (ln) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 10/18/2021 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ln) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ln) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ln) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln) |
Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Worldbridge Logistics, Inc. (ln) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd. (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3430842) filed by Worldbridge Logistics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Bill of Lading, #2 Exhibit B - USPTO Registration, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Incontestability, #4 Exhibit D - Chinese Trademark Registration, #5 Exhibit E - ImportGenius Report, #6 Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet)(ln) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for J. Cole Dowsley, Jr. and Sarah M. Ferraro admitted to this court. (ln) |
FL State Bar status verified as active for Shanshan Liang not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (ln) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Shanshan Liang: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 9/7/2021. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Worldbridge Logistics, Inc. v. World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Worldbridge Logistics, Inc. | |
Represented By: | J. Cole Dowsley, Jr. |
Represented By: | Sarah M. Ferraro |
Represented By: | Shanshan Liang |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: World Bridge Logistics Co., Ltd. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.