Garg v. The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics et al
Dr. Aneesh Garg |
The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics and Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC |
3:2021cv00661 |
August 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
William L Campbell |
Barbara D Holmes |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC, The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A Members)(Leathers, H.) |
Filing 12 Order: The initial case management conference is therefore RESCHEDULED for January 27, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. to be held telephonically using the dial-in instructions detailed in the original notice. #5 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/13/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (kc). |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of #10 MOTION to Compel Mediation and, If Necessary, Arbitration and Stay Court Proceedings filed by Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC, The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics . (Leathers, H.) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Compel Mediation and, If Necessary, Arbitration and Stay Court Proceedings by Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC, The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Lana Thomas-Folds)(Leathers, H.) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics and Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC Answers are due 10/11/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 9/24/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC, The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics. (Leathers, H.) |
Filing 7 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/26/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Filing 6 Summons issued as to Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC and The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics. (kc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 10/18/2021 at 3:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (kc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC and The Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 06503436184), filed by Aneesh Garg. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) |
State Bar status verified as active for Brian C. Winfrey admitted to this court. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.