Ingram Barge Company LLC v. Michigan Salt Products, LLC
Plaintiff: Ingram Barge Company LLC
Defendant: Michigan Salt Products, LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv00674
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Alistair Newbern
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION to Continue -- Motion to Reset Initial Case Management Conference Pending Filing of Motion for Default Judgment by Ingram Barge Company LLC. (Phillips, W.)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 : Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 83.01(b), the Motion for Raymond T. Waid and David L. Reisman to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. Signed by Lynda Hill, Clerk of Court, on 09/27/2021. (lh)
September 23, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing by Ingram Barge Company LLC re #10 MOTION for attorney Raymond T. Waid and David L. Reisman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $300 PHV fee; receipt number 0650-3451918), Annotation - Deficiency Notice,, Amended Declarations of Reisman and Waid (Attachments: #1 Attachment Amended Declaration of Reisman, #2 Attachment Amended Declaration of Waid)(Phillips, W.)
September 22, 2021 NOTICE TO FILER re DE#10 : The pending pro hac vice motion does not comply with the Court's local rules, because the motion fails to state whether disciplinary proceedings by any disciplinary authority, a finding of contempt or a sanction under 28 U.S.C. 1927 by any court, or criminal charges have been instituted against the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission. Local Rule 83.01(b)(2). By no later than five (5) business days from the date of this docket annotation, the pro hac vice motion must be supplemented by the filing of a statement under oath of the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission disclosing such matters. Failure to do so will result in denial of the pro hac vice motion. (dt)
September 21, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for attorney Raymond T. Waid and David L. Reisman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $300 PHV fee; receipt number 0650-3451918) by Ingram Barge Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Reisman Declaration, #2 Attachment Reisman Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Attachment Waid Declaration, #4 Attachment Waid Certificate of Good Standing, #5 Attachment Proposed Order)(Phillips, W.)
September 14, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Ingram Barge Company LLC. Michigan Salt Products, LLC served on 9/7/2021. (Phillips, W.)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/1/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
August 31, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 11/4/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (dt)
August 31, 2021 Filing 6 Summons issued as to Michigan Salt Products, LLC. (Service copies will be picked up by counsel.) (dt)
August 31, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (dt)
August 31, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (dt)
August 31, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt)
August 31, 2021 TN State Bar status verified as active for W. Brantley Phillips, Jr admitted to this court. (dt)
August 31, 2021 NOTICE TO COUNSEL David L. Reisman and Raymond T. Waid: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 9/21/2021. (dt)
August 31, 2021 LA State Bar status verified as active for David L. Reisman and Raymond T. Waid not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (dt)
August 30, 2021 Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ingram Barge Company LLC. (dt)
August 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michigan Salt Products, LLC (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3438985), filed by Ingram Barge Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 2019.05.16 Email, #2 Exhibit 2 - Transportation Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Amendment 1, #4 Exhibit 4 - 2019 Lock Surcharge Rates, #5 Exhibit 5 - Invoice 1959436, #6 Exhibit 6 - Invoice 1960306, #7 Exhibit 7 - Invoice 1960765, #8 Exhibit 8 - Invoice 1961829, #9 Exhibit 9 - Invoice 1963974, #10 Exhibit 10 - Invoice 1964290, #11 Exhibit 11 - Invoice 1964498, #12 Exhibit 12 - Invoice 1964705, #13 Exhibit 13 - Invoice 1965374, #14 Exhibit 14 - Invoice 1965881, #15 Exhibit 15 - Invoice 1966060, #16 Exhibit 16 - Invoice 1966361, #17 Exhibit 17 - Invoice 1970185, #18 Exhibit 18 - Invoice 1970943, #19 Exhibit 19 - Invoice 1971129, #20 Exhibit 20 - Invoice 1971362, #21 Exhibit 21 - Invoice 88008813, #22 Exhibit 22 - Invoice 88008184, #23 Exhibit 23 - Invoice 1959591, #24 Exhibit 24 - Invoice 1960516, #25 Exhibit 25 - Invoice 1960517, #26 Exhibit 26 - Invoice 1960518, #27 Exhibit 27 - Invoice 1960519, #28 Exhibit 28 - Invoice 1960520, #29 Exhibit 29 - Invoice 1960521, #30 Exhibit 30 - Invoice 1961207, #31 Exhibit 31 - Invoice 1961208, #32 Exhibit 32 - Invoice 1961209, #33 Exhibit 33 - Invoice 1961210, #34 Exhibit 34 - Invoice 1961830, #35 Exhibit 35 - Invoice 1961831, #36 Exhibit 36 - Invoice 1961832, #37 Exhibit 37 - Invoice 1961833, #38 Exhibit 38 - Invoice 1961834, #39 Exhibit 39 - Invoice 1961835, #40 Exhibit 40 - Invoice 1961836, #41 Exhibit 41 - Invoice 1963510, #42 Exhibit 42 - Invoice 1963975, #43 Exhibit 43 - Invoice 1963976, #44 Exhibit 44 - Invoice 1963977, #45 Exhibit 45 - Invoice 1964139, #46 Exhibit 46 - Invoice 1965030, #47 Exhibit 47 - Invoice 1965031, #48 Exhibit 48 - Invoice 1965032, #49 Exhibit 49 - Invoice 1965033, #50 Exhibit 50 - Invoice 1965034, #51 Exhibit 51 - Invoice 1965034, #52 Exhibit 52 - Invoice 1965265, #53 Exhibit 53 - Invoice 1965266, #54 Exhibit 54 - Invoice 1966061, #55 Exhibit 55 - Invoice 1966062, #56 Exhibit 56 - Invoice 1966063, #57 Exhibit 57 - Invoice 1966948, #58 Exhibit 58 - Invoice 1970186, #59 Exhibit 59 - Invoice 1971694, #60 Exhibit 60 - Invoice 1971695, #61 Exhibit 61 - Invoice 1971696, #62 Exhibit 62 - Invoice 1971697, #63 Exhibit 63 - Invoice 1971698, #64 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingram Barge Company LLC v. Michigan Salt Products, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ingram Barge Company LLC
Represented By: David L. Reisman
Represented By: Raymond T. Waid
Represented By: W. Brantley Phillips, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michigan Salt Products, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?