Montgomery v. Hall et al
| Gary Montgomery |
| Daron Hall and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County |
| 3:2021cv00701 |
| September 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time #8 is GRANTED IN PART. Respondent's submissions must be received no later than November 30, 2021. Petitioner may submit a reply on the terms previously set forth by the Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/5/2021. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Daron Hall. (Ayers, John)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Metro is DISMISSED as a respondent. Respondent Hall is DIRECTED to file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the Petition in accordance with Habeas Rule 5 within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Montgomery's request for a TRO is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the Petition and this Order on Respondent and the Attorney General of Tennessee. See Habeas Rule 4. (xc: Copy of Order forwarded to Pro se party, Respondent Daron Hall and TN Attorney General's Office by regular mail. Copy of Petition forwarded to Respondent Daron Hall and TN Attorney General's Office by regular mail.) Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/18/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) Modified on 10/19/2021 (kc).
|
|
Filing 6
RECEIPT #34675063801 in the amount of $5 posted by Gary Montgomery re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (kc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: To proceed in this matter, Montgomery MUST submit either (1) the $5.00 filing fee, 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), or (2) an application to proceed as a pauper. The Clerk SHALL mail Montgomery a copy of the short-form in forma pauperis application form for prisoners (AO 240). The Court observes that Montgomery's request for injunctive relief appears procedurally deficient. Specifically, Montgomery has not filed a "written motion". Plaintiff MAY submit a properly-supported, procedurally-compliant motion for preliminary injunctive relief that the Court will consider in due course under the Federal Rules. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/21/2021. (xc: Order and AO 240 Form forwarded to Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gary Montgomery. (kc)
|
|
Filing 1
EMERGENCY PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and for INJUNCTIVE RELIEF and TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, filed by Gary Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit A - L)(kc)
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
