Stevenson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff: John E. Stevenson
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00719
Filed: September 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/13/2022; Discovery due by 9/12/2022; and Dispositive Motions due by 2/27/2023. A subsequent case management conference shall be held telephonically using the Court's conference line (see Docket No. #14 for dial-in details) on June 30, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. (CDT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 11/9/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
November 2, 2021 TN State Bar status verified as active for Marshall Thomas McFarland admitted to this court. (mg)
November 1, 2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes: Intial Case Management Conference by Telephone held on 11/1/2021; ORDER to enter. (Tape #not recorded.) (Hearing lasted :27)(jwc) (Time in court changed to 27 min. Modified on 11/9/2021) (bs).
November 1, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Marshall Thomas McFarland on behalf of CSX Transportation, Inc. (McFarland, Marshall)
October 26, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone continued from 10/26/21 to 11/1/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. Call 1-877-402-9753 access code 3808663#. (bs)
October 26, 2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes: Initial Case Management Conference Convened by Telephone on 10/26/2021; Plaintiff's counsel failed to appear. Parties to consult and contact the Court to reschedule the ICMC; no order to enter. (Tape #not recorded.) (Hearing lasted :15)(jwc)
October 21, 2021 Filing 13 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by All Parties filed by John E. Stevenson. (Grooms, Garry)
October 21, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #9 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by John E. Stevenson.(Grooms, Garry)
October 13, 2021 Filing 11 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by John E. Stevenson. (Grooms, Garry)
October 12, 2021 TN State Bar status verified as active for Jack W. Robinson, Jr admitted to this court. (mg)
October 11, 2021 Filing 10 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Robinson, Jack)
October 11, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against John E. Stevenson by CSX Transportation, Inc. (Robinson, Jack) Modified on 10/12/2021 (mg).
September 23, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by John E. Stevenson. CSX Transportation, Inc. served on 9/20/2021. (Grooms, Garry)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/16/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
September 15, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 10/26/2021 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (mg)
September 15, 2021 Filing 5 Summons issued as to CSX Transportation, Inc. Service copies can be picked up by counsel at Intake of the Clerk's Office between the hours of 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. (mg)
September 15, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg)
September 15, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg)
September 15, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg)
September 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CSX Transportation, Inc. (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3448723), filed by John E. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Special Warranty Deed dated November 13, 2003, #2 Exhibit B - Depiction of Property, #3 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg)
September 15, 2021 TN State Bar status verified as active for Garry K. Grooms admitted to this court. (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevenson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John E. Stevenson
Represented By: Garry K. Grooms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Represented By: Marshall Thomas McFarland
Represented By: Jack W. Robinson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?