Bowman v. Speedway, LLC
| Tanisha Bowman |
| Speedway, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00814 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Eli J Richardson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for James T. Sullivan admitted to this court. (dt) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James T. Sullivan on behalf of Tanisha Bowman (Sullivan, James) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Speedway, LLC.(Martin, Sean) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 motion for extension of time to answer. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by no later than November 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 11/03/2021. (BH)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Speedway, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond)(Martin, Sean) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER : This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 10/28/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 1/10/2022 at 3:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (dt) |
| Filing 5 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Speedway, LLC. (Martin, Sean) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (dt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (dt) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for James T. Sullivan and Sean W. Martin admitted to this court. (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tanisha Bowman (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3473293), filed by Speedway, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bowman v. Speedway, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tanisha Bowman | |
| Represented By: | James T. Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Speedway, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Sean W. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
