Montgomery v. Conrad et al
| Gary Montgomery |
| Thomas Conrad, Leonard Johnson, Richard Grant, Sharon Baxter, Granvisse Earl, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Daron Hall, Securus Technologies and Vend Engine |
| 3:2021cv00820 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc)
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Sharon Baxter, Thomas Conrad, Granvisse Earl, Richard Grant, Daron Hall, Leonard Johnson, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Securus Technologies, and Vend Engine (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 34675063997), filed by Gary Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Cover Letter, #2 Attachment - Receipt)(kc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
