Yost v. Blue Pine Construction Corp
Plaintiff: Michael Yost
Defendant: Blue Pine Construction Corp
Case Number: 3:2021cv00844
Filed: November 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Jeffery S Frensley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is reset for 2/7/2022 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 12/29/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Michael Yost. Blue Pine Construction Corp served on 11/17/2021. (Biesecker, Kyle)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 11/10/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 1/4/2021 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (dt)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons issued as to Blue Pine Construction Corp. (Service copies returned to counsel by mail.) (dt)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (dt)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (dt)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Kyle Frederick Biesecker admitted to this court. (dt)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Frederick Biesecker on behalf of Michael Yost. (dt)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blue Pine Construction Corp (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3481310), filed by Michael Yost. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yost v. Blue Pine Construction Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Yost
Represented By: Kyle Frederick Biesecker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Pine Construction Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?