Martin v. Hill et al
Plaintiff: Frederick D. Martin
Defendant: Lt. E. Hill and Nurse Stetmanson
Case Number: 3:2021cv00858
Filed: November 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Plaintiff Frederick D. Martin is hereby assessed the full filing fee of $350, his application (Doc. No. #4 ) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED send a copy of this order to the administrator of inmate trust fund accounts at the TTCC. Having conducted the screening required by the PLRA, the Court determines that the complaint states an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Lieutenant Hill in his individual capacity. Further, the complaint states a First Amendment retaliation claim against Lieutenant Hill in his individual capacity. These claims shall proceed for further development of the record.All other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. Consequently, the Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Lieutenant Hill. The Clerk also shall send the Plaintiff the Court's Information Sheet for pro se prisoners entitled "Service of Process in Civil Rights Cases." Plaintiff MUST complete the service packet and return it to the Clerks Office no later than 30 days after entry of this Order. Upon return of the service packet, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE to Defendant. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pre-trial, non-dispositive motions, to issue a Report and Recommendation on all dispositive motions, and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/11/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail with Service Packet. Copy to TTCC.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/11/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Frederick D. Martin. (jm)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Plaintiff now has filed a timely Motion requesting a 30-day extension of time for purposes of obtaining his certified statement. (Doc. No. #8 ). The Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's new deadline for submitting a copy of certified inmate trust fund account statement is January 20, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 12/13/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for a 30 day continuance to comply with the Judges orders to obtain a 6 month trust fund by Frederick D. Martin. (jm)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Letter from Frederick D. Martin re incident on June 3, 2021. (jm)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This action cannot proceed without further action by Plaintiff. His application to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete. If seeking pauper status, a prisoner-plaintiff must provide a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is entered to submit the required statement. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/19/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jm)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Frederick D. Martin. (jm)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Frederick D. Martin. (jm)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (jm)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E. Hill and Nurse Stetmanson, filed by Frederick D. Martin. (jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Hill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick D. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. E. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Stetmanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?