Matos v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Yasney Matos
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2021cv00927
Filed: December 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Referring Judge: Eli J Richardson
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2022 Filing 12 SUMMONS returned executed by Yasney Matos. United States of America (c/o AG of the United States) served on 1/6/2022. (Walwyn, Marc) Modified on 1/12/2022 (ln).
January 11, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed by Yasney Matos. United States of America (c/o Office of the US Attorney) served on 1/3/2022. (Walwyn, Marc) Modified on 1/12/2022 (ln).
December 27, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Marc A. Walwyn (Walwyn, Marc)
December 27, 2021 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to United States of America (U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General). Service copies will be returned to counsel by regular mail. (ln)
December 22, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Summons to be Issued as to United States of America. (Walwyn, Marc)
December 22, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Summons to be Issued as to United States of America. (Walwyn, Marc)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 12/20/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
December 16, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/8/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (ln)
December 16, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ln)
December 16, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ln)
December 16, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln)
December 16, 2021 TN State Bar status verified as active for Marc A. Walwyn admitted to this court. (ln)
December 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3500285) filed by Yasney Matos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Administrative Claim Form 95 (without attachments), #2 Exhibit B - Written notification from the USPS, #3 Exhibit C - Administrative Claim Form 95 (without attachments), #4 Exhibit D - Administrative Claim Form 95 (without attachments), #5 Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet)(ln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matos v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yasney Matos
Represented By: Marc A. Walwyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?