Hall v. Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc.
Terri Hall |
Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc. |
3:2022cv00009 |
January 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Barbara D Holmes |
Eli J Richardson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: Motion for an Extension of Time, Docket Entry No. #8 is GRANTED. The March 8 at 11:30, ICMC remains as scheduled and all parties are expected to participate in the preparation of the proposed Initial Case Man. Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/22/2022. (mg) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment [Proposed] Order)(Mack, Emily) |
Filing 7 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/6/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/8/2022 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (mg) |
Filing 5 Summons issued as to Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/11/2022) (mg). |
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for G. Brandon Hall, Lauren J. Irwin admitted to this court. (mg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc. (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3508542), filed by Terri Hall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Right to Sue, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) Modified on 1/6/2022 (mg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hall v. Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Terri Hall | |
Represented By: | G. Brandon Hall |
Represented By: | Lauren J. Irwin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Emily Harper Mack |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.