Stanback v. Sitel Worldwide Corporation et al
Plaintiff: KIRSTEN Stanback
Defendant: Sitel Worldwide Corporation and Sitel Operating Corporation
Case Number: 3:2022cv00025
Filed: January 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing by Kirsten Stanback of Consent to Join Shakita Williams (Turner, Robert)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 1/18/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
January 18, 2022 Filing 7 Summons issued as to Sitel Operating Corporation and Sitel Worldwide Corporation. (Service copies mailed to counsel.) (bs) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/18/2022) (bs).
January 14, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/21/2022 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (bs)
January 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/21/2022 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (bs)
January 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (bs)
January 14, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (bs)
January 14, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (bs)
January 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sitel Operating Corporation, Sitel Worldwide Corporation (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3514627), filed by KIRSTEN Stanback. (Attachments: #1 - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 A- Kirsten Stanback Consent to Join)(bs)
January 14, 2022 TN State Bar status verified as active for J. Russ Bryant, Robert E. Turner, IV, Robert E. Morelli, III, and Nina H. Parsley admitted to this court. (bs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanback v. Sitel Worldwide Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIRSTEN Stanback
Represented By: J. Russ Bryant
Represented By: Nina H. Parsley
Represented By: Robert E. Morelli, III
Represented By: Robert E. Turner, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sitel Worldwide Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sitel Operating Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?