Joiner v. John Wilder Youth Development Center
Melanie Renee Joiner |
John Wilder Youth Development Center |
3:2022cv00062 |
January 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Barbara D Holmes |
Eli J Richardson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties in this case are exempt from the initial disclosures required by Rule 26(a) and the requirements of Rule 26(f). Pursuant to Local Rule 16.01(c)(1), this case is exempt from customized case management. By a separate order entered at the appropriate time, the Court will enter a scheduling order setting out deadlines for the progression of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/7/2022. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Because Plaintiff has paid the full civil filing fee, there is no further screening of the Complaint. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Plaintiff is responsible for effecting service of process on Defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 2/3/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln) |
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Wilder Youth Development Center (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 34675064839), filed by Melanie Renee Joiner. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 2 Cover Letters, #2 Attachment Receipt for Filing Fee, #3 Exhibit Exhibits)(kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Joiner v. John Wilder Youth Development Center | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Melanie Renee Joiner | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Wilder Youth Development Center | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.