Booker v. Jones et al
Plaintiff: Kavaris Booker
Defendant: Joshua Jones, Ladarrius Drain and Fredrick Estes
Case Number: 3:2022cv00064
Filed: February 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Referring Judge: Eli J Richardson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2022 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Not Deliverable, Paroled as Addressed, re: #6 Order. Mail sent to Kavaris Booker. (dt)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP application (Doc. No. #2 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new, properly supported application. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a new IFP application form (short form). To proceed with his lawsuit, Plaintiff MUST either pay the $402 filing fee in full or complete the application form (including answers to all questions on the form) and return it to the Court with the required certified trust account statement. Plaintiffs payment or supported application must be received in this Court within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket and must include the docket number assigned to this case: No. 3:22-cv-00064. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 2/24/2022. (xc: Pro se party w/ IFP form by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
February 1, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (dt)
February 1, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt)
February 1, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kavaris Booker. (dt)
February 1, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kavaris Booker. (dt)
February 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ladarrius Drain, Fredrick Estes and Joshua Jones, filed by Kavaris Booker.(dt)
February 1, 2022 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included). (dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Booker v. Jones et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kavaris Booker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ladarrius Drain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fredrick Estes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?