Woodmore v. Cincinnati Lubes, Inc.
| Keith Woodmore |
| Cincinnati Lubes, Inc. doing business as Jiffy Lube |
| 3:2022cv00077 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL: Jury Trial is set for 10/24/2023 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Eli J. Richardson. Pretrial Conference is set for 10/16/2023 at 8:30 AM before District Judge Eli J. Richardson. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/9/2023. Exhibit List due by 10/9/2023. Witness List due by 10/9/2023. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 4/1/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing 14
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 8/31/2022. Discovery due by 1/19/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 4/6/2023. Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 11/29/2022 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 3/31/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern: Case Management Conference by Telephone held on 3/31/2022. (Hearing lasted 00:08)(sd) |
| Filing 13 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - Signed filed by Keith Woodmore. (Collins, Heather) |
| NOTICE TO FILER re DE#12 : The document is not signed. Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 167-1, Section 8, electronically filed documents shall set forth the Filing User's name, address, telephone number and Board of Professional Responsibility registration number. The filer's name should be typed in the space where the signature would otherwise appear preceded by the symbol "s/" or inserted facsimile signature. Counsel shall re-file the document. (ln) |
| Filing 12 ****DISREGARD. DOCUMENT IS NOT SIGNED BY ATTORNEYS. ATTORNEYS TO RE-FILE.**** PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - Joint filed by Keith Woodmore. (Collins, Heather) Modified on 3/28/2022 (ln). |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Caroline Drinnon admitted to this court. (ln) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline Drinnon on behalf of Keith Woodmore (Drinnon, Caroline) |
| Filing 10 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Cincinnati Lubes, Inc.. (Cook, Jennifer) |
| NOTICE TO FILER re DE#9 -1: The wrong event was used. The Business Entity Disclosure Statement should be entered separately. The correct event should be Other Documents / Business Entity Disclosure Statement. Counsel shall re-file the document. (ln) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Jennifer G. Cook admitted to this court. (ln) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cincinnati Lubes, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Business Entity disclosure Cincinnati Lubes, Inc.)(Cook, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Keith Woodmore. Cincinnati Lubes, Inc. served on 2/14/2022. (Walter, Ashley) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 2/7/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
| Filing 6 Summons issued as to Cincinnati Lubes, Inc. Service copies will be returned to counsel (Heather Collins) by regular mail. (ln) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 3/31/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (ln) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ln) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ln) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cincinnati Lubes, Inc. (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3526914) filed by Keith Woodmore. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet)(ln) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Heather M. Collins and Ashley S. Walter admitted to this court. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodmore v. Cincinnati Lubes, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keith Woodmore | |
| Represented By: | Ashley S. Walter |
| Represented By: | Heather M. Collins |
| Represented By: | Caroline Drinnon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cincinnati Lubes, Inc. doing business as Jiffy Lube | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer G. Cook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
