Lacey v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| Samantha Lacey |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center |
| 3:2022cv00139 |
| February 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1--Compensation Policy)(Wright, Luther) |
| Filing 10 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. (Shackelford, Erin) |
| TNState Bar status verified as active for Luther Wright, Jr, and Erin A. Shackelford admitted to this court. (mg) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin A. Shackelford on behalf of Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Shackelford, Erin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Luther Wright, Jr on behalf of Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Wright, Luther) |
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 2/28/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 5/3/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (mg) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for R. Scott Jackson, Jr admitted to this court. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3539917), filed by Samantha Lacey. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lacey v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samantha Lacey | |
| Represented By: | R. Scott Jackson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vanderbilt University Medical Center | |
| Represented By: | Erin A. Shackelford |
| Represented By: | Luther Wright, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
