Cannamela v. United States of America
Petitioner: Curt Russell Cannamela
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2022cv00152
Filed: March 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Government's Motion for Leave to Substitute Counsel (Doc. No. #6 ) is GRANTED. Accordingly, Assistant United States Attorney S. Carran Daughtrey is substituted for Assistant United States Attorney Brent A. Hannafan as the attorney of record in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/22/2022. (ln)
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Substitute Counsel by United States of America. (Daughtrey, S.)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Luke A. Evans admitted to this court. (kc)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER APPOINTING CJA PANEL ATTORNEY AND DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUBPOENAS AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE. IT IS ORDERED that Luke A. Evans, Esq., PO Box 398, Murfreesboro, TN, is hereby appointed to represent Petitioner, Curt Russell Cannamela. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/3/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The Court rules as follows: 1. The Clerk's office is directed to open a civil matter under 28 U.S.C. 2255 and file this order as well as Cannamela's motions under that caption; 2. The Federal Public Defender shall appoint counsel to represent Petitioner; 3. On or before April 15, 2022, appointed counsel shall file an amended petition on behalf of Cannamela. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/2/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Curt Russell Cannamela.(kc)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Henry Alan Martin and Brent Adams Hannafan admitted to this court. (kc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cannamela v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Curt Russell Cannamela
Represented By: Henry Alan Martin
Represented By: Luke A. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Brent Adams Hannafan
Represented By: S. Carran Daughtrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?