Brownlee v. Frost-Arnett Company
Latrisa Brownlee |
Frost-Arnett Company |
3:2022cv00381 |
May 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Aleta A Trauger |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER finding as moot #11 Unopposed Motion to Continue the ICMC. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/11/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Latrisa Brownlee. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Lafferty, Susan) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Upon review of Plaintiff's #7 Unopposed Motion to Continue Initial Case Management Conference, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and the Initial Case Management Conference is continued to September 12, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/6/2022. (mg) Modified on 7/6/2022 (mg). |
Filing 9 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Frost-Arnett Company. (Wilson, Stuart) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Frost-Arnett Company. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Business Entity Disclosure)(Wilson, Stuart) |
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#7 : Pursuant to Local Rule 5.01, Certificates of Service shall identify by name the person served, what was served, the method of service, and date of service. Counsel did not include all Counsel on the certificate of service. Please FILE a conformed Certificate of Service for this document. (kc) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Latrisa Brownlee. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Lafferty, Susan) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Latrisa Brownlee. Frost-Arnett Company served on 6/13/2022. (Lafferty, Susan) |
Filing 5 Summons issued as to Frost-Arnett Company. (Service packet returned to counsel by regular mail.) (kc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference is set for 7/25/2022 at 3:30 PM in Chambers - Suite 6325 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. (kc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frost-Arnett Company (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3600671), filed by Latrisa Brownlee. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Susan S. Lafferty admitted to this court. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brownlee v. Frost-Arnett Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Latrisa Brownlee | |
Represented By: | Susan S. Lafferty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company | |
Represented By: | Stuart A. Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.