Robinson v. Morgan et al
| Michael Robinson |
| Roy B. Morgan, City of Jackson Police Department, Nick Donald, Brad Champaine, Jodey Pickson and Jeremy Epperson |
| 3:2022cv00442 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: By Order entered June 16, 2022 (Doc. No. #5 ), the Court noted the deficiency in Plaintiff's filing and directed the Clerk of Court to mail Plaintiff another IFP application form. The Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay the $402 filing fee in full or complete and return the IFP application within 30 days. Plaintiff has not filed anything further in this case, and his deadline for doing so has passed. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Courts Order. Accordingly, the entire $402 fee is hereby ASSESSED. The Clerk of Court MUST send a copy of this Order to the warden of the facility where Plaintiff is housed to ensure compliance with that portion of 28 U.S.C. 1915 pertaining to the payment of the filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/2/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with a copy of this Order to the Warden at the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Michael Robinson, a state inmate incarcerated at the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center in Hartsville, Tennessee, has filed a pro se complaint for alleged violation of civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Doc. No. #1 ), a Motion to Proceed as Indigent (Doc. No. #2 ), and a Motion to Produce Courtroom Security Footage Video (Doc. No. #3 ). Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed as Indigent does not establish his inability to prepay the filing fee, nor is it supported by a certified trust fund account statement. That Motion (Doc. No. #2 ) is therefore DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new, properly supported IFP application. In addition, as Plaintiff has not yet resolved the issue of the filing fee, his discovery-related Motion to Produce Courtroom Security Footage Video (Doc. No. #3 ) is premature and is therefore DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal, if necessary, at the appropriate time. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank IFP application (short form). To proceed with his lawsuit, Plaintiff MUST either pay the $402 filing fee in full or complete the application and return it to the Court with the required certified trust account statement. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/16/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with a blank IFP application (short form).) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (hb) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (hb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Produce Court Room Security Footage Video by Michael Robinson. (hb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO PROCEED AS INDIGENT by Michael Robinson. (hb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brad Champaine, City of Jackson Police Department, Nick Donald, Jeremy Epperson, Roy B. Morgan, Jodey Pickson, filed by Michael Robinson.(hb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
