Leslie v. Mack et al
| Edwin W. Leslie |
| Edwin E. Mack, Jr., Jennifer Mack, Estate of Alice Elene Burghdorf, Estate of Anne E. Malone, Estate of John R. McGibbon and Unknown Property in Canada |
| 3:2022cv00504 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Amend Complaint. Leslie is ORDERED to file an amended complaint by September 6, 2022. The amended complaint will replace his original complaint and therefore must include all of the factual allegations and legal claims he wants the Curt to consider in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/22/2022. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Edwin E. Mack, Jr. and Jennifer Mack's Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) Defendants Edwin E. Mack and Jennifer Mack's Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant Macks' Motion to Dismiss filed by Edwin E. Mack, Jr, Jennifer Mack. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Attorney Larry Crain in Support of Defendants Macks' Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Exhibit to Declaration of Attorney Larry Crain, #3 Exhibit Exhibit to Attorney Declaration of Attorney Larry Crain)(Crain, Larry) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Objection to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Edwin E. Mack, Jr. and Jennifer Mack's Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) and #13 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint filed by Edwin W. Leslie. (dt) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Edwin E. Mack, Jr. and Jennifer Mack's Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) filed by Edwin W. Leslie. (dt) |
| MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, by Edwin W. Leslie. (FILED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES, SEE DE#13 TO SEE PDF) (dt) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: On August 5, 2022, Defendants Edwin Mack, Jr., and Jennifer Mack filed motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). (Doc. No. #9 .) Under this Court's Local Rule 7.01(a)(3), the plaintiff shall file any response in opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than fourteen days after being served with the motion. M.D. Tenn. R. 7.01(a)(3) (response). The defendants may file an optional reply, limited to five pages, within seven days after service of the response. M.D. Tenn. R. 7.01(a)(4) (reply). Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/9/2022. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing by Edwin E. Mack, Jr, Jennifer Mack re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Edwin E. Mack, Jr. and Jennifer Mack's Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) Notice of Filing Declaration of Attorney Larry L. Crain in Support of Defendants Edwin E. Mack and Jennifer Mack's Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Attorney Larry L. Crain in Support of Defendants Mack's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 to Declaration of Attorney Larry L. Crain, #3 Exhibit Ex. 2 to Declaration of Attorney Larry L. Crain, #4 Exhibit Ex. 3 to Declaration of Attorney Larry L. Crain)(Crain, Larry) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Edwin E. Mack, Jr. and Jennifer Mack's Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) filed by Edwin E. Mack, Jr, Jennifer Mack . (Crain, Larry) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Edwin E. Mack, Jr. and Jennifer Mack's Motion to Dismiss Under 12(b)(1) by Edwin E. Mack, Jr, Jennifer Mack. (Crain, Larry) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Larry Lamont Crain admitted to this court. (dt) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry Lamont Crain on behalf of Edwin E. Mack, Jr, Jennifer Mack (Crain, Larry) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed as to Jennifer Mack served on 7/18/2022. (dt) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Edwin W. Leslie. Edwin E. Mack, Jr served on 7/18/2022. (ln) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/12/2022. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Edwin E. Mack, Jr and Jennifer Mack. (Service copies returned to pro se plaintiff by mail.) (dt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (dt) |
| Filing 2 RECEIPT #34675066385 in the amount of $402 posted by Edwin W. Leslie re #1 Complaint. (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Estate of Alice Elene Burghdorf, Estate of Anne E. Malone, Estate of John R. McGibbon, Edwin E. Mack, Jr, Jennifer Mack, Unknown Property in Canada (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 34675066385), filed by Edwin W. Leslie. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
