Manley v. Everhart et al
| Michael Manley |
| Nathan Everhart, Cody Swift and Shelbyville Police Department |
| 3:2022cv00588 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| This case has been transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Winchester Division at Winchester. (kc) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Winchester Division at Winchester. 28 U.S.C. 123(a)(4). Plaintiff MUST send all future filings in this case to the Eastern District of Tennessee. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/24/2022. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (fee not paid) against Nathan Everhart, Shelbyville Police Department, Cody Swift, filed by Michael Manley. (jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
