Loucks v. State of Tennessee et al
| Paul Loucks |
| State of Tennessee and Dickson County |
| 3:2022cv00617 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AMENDED Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Paul Loucks. (ln) |
| Filing 5 RECEIPT #34675066980 in the amount of $5.00 posted by Paul Loucks re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ln) |
| NOTICE TO FILER re DE#5 : Duplicate payment. Refund must be approved by the Clerk. (ln) |
| Filing 4 Letter regarding filing fee from Paul Loucks. (ln) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Paul Loucks. (ln) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Filing fee $5, receipt number 34675066803) filed by Paul Loucks. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Receipt for Filing Fee)(ln) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included). (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
