Copple v. Southern Bank of Tennessee
| George E. Copple |
| Southern Bank of Tennessee |
| 3:2022cv00692 |
| September 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by George E. Copple. (Copple, George)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Given the pendency of a Motion to Dismiss #9 , it is hereby ORDERED that the initial case management conference scheduled for October 31, 2022 is CONTINUED, to be reset, if appropriate, following disposition of this motion. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/20/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Southern Bank of Tennessee . (Baxter, John)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Southern Bank of Tennessee. (Baxter, John)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS returned executed by George E. Copple. All Plaintiffs. (Copple, George)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons issued as to Southern Bank of Tennessee. (Service pages returned to Mr. Copple by regular mail.) (kc)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Summons to be Issued as to defendant Southern Bank of Tennessee. (Copple, George)
|
|
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#5 : The wrong event was used. The correct event should be Notice of Summons to be Issued. Counsel shall re-file the document. (kc)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by George E. Copple Summons to Defendant (Copple, George)
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference is set for 10/31/2022 at 02:30 PM in Chambers - Suite 6325 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. (kc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Southern Bank of Tennessee (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3662024), filed by George E. Copple. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Adverse Action, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Copple v. Southern Bank of Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George E. Copple | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Southern Bank of Tennessee | |
| Represented By: | John Thompson Baxter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
