Robinson v. Frink
| Louis Tyrone Robinson |
| Warden Martin Frink |
| 3:2022cv00753 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CHALLENGES TO FRAUDULENT OBTAIN CRIMINAL CONVICTION'S (5), DUE TO "EXCEPTIONAL-CIRCUMSTANCE," NOW WHERE I ASK THIS HONORABLE COURT TO GRANT HIM A STAY, PENDING THE RETRIEVAL OF THE NEEDED RULE-11-SENTENCING HEARING IN CASE NO. 9103, 14296, AND 14358, ON ALL COUNTS by Louis Tyrone Robinson. (ln) |
| Filing 9 Page 1 of "PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254" by Louis Tyrone Robinson. (No other pages received.) (ln) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE (signed by Louis Robinson only) by Louis Tyrone Robinson. (ln) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE from 6CCA: Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to the Sixth Circuit. (JEC) (hb) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1631 and Sims, the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this case to the Sixth Circuit. Petitioner's in forma pauperis application (Doc. No. #3 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk SHALL close this case without entry of a judgment. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 9/29/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. Copy of Order sent to the Sixth Circuit by email.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael Matthew Stahl admitted to this court. (ln) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Matthew Stahl on behalf of Martin Frink (Stahl, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included). (ln) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Louis Tyrone Robinson. (ln) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by Louis Tyrone Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Exhibits to Memorandum, part 1, #2 Exhibit - Exhibits to Memorandum, part 2, #3 Exhibit - Exhibits to Memorandum, part 3)(ln) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by Louis Tyrone Robinson. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Frink | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Louis Tyrone Robinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Martin Frink | |
| Represented By: | Michael Matthew Stahl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
