Cannamela v. United States of America
Petitioner: Curt Russell Cannamela
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2022cv01070
Filed: December 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Disqualify by Curt Russell Cannamela. (kc)
January 13, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE from 6CCA: Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, (GSA) (hb)
January 13, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE from 6CCA: Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Curt Russell Cannamela. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 01/12/2023. (GSA) (hb)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1631, the Clerk of the Court shall transfer this case along with this Court's prior Memorandum Opinion and Order (Case No. 3:22-CV-152, Doc. No. 18) to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for its consideration as to whether authorization of a second or successive 2255 petition is warranted. With that, the Government's Motion to Dismiss #4 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/11/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. This order and order 18 from case 3:22-cv-152 forwarded to 6th Circuit by cm/ecf.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
January 10, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Judicial Memorandum by Curt Russell Cannamela. (kc)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Substitute Assistant United States Attorney S. Carran Daughtrey for Assistant United States Attorney Brent A. Hannafan. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/5/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (mg)
January 4, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Successive Petition Pursuant to 28 USC 2255 by United States of America. (Daughtrey, S.)
January 4, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by United States of America. (Daughtrey, S.)
December 29, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
December 29, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Curt Russell Cannamela.(kc)
December 29, 2022 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cannamela v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Curt Russell Cannamela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Brent Adams Hannafan
Represented By: S. Carran Daughtrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?